Real Estate Investment Case Study Challenge #1
Introduction
This post will challenge you to build a real estate private equity investment case study. The challenge prompt is at the bottom of this post. We will review your case if submitted to our case study help forum before April 21, 2019. One accurate solution exists, but your Excel could look different than any other participant's Excel. We will judge you on your use of simple formulas, style and arrangement, trustworthiness, and correctness.
We will professionally review cases submitted to the relevant thread in our Case Study Help forum before the deadline of April 21st at 11:59pm
No two excel models are ever quite the same. Your approach may look and feel a bit different than another participant's approach. When building your case and referencing educational materials, focus less on the exact design and implementation of the solution. Where you may choose an INDEX-MATCH, another might prefer a SUMIFS. Rather, focus on the investment thesis and cash flow story that drives the model.
Although your implementation may vary, only one accurate solution exists for this particular real estate investment case study challenge. We provide you with all relevant inputs, removing assumption uncertainty. Because one solution exists, we are able to judge the correctness of your model. Bear in mind, this challenge tests your mechanical ability and general awareness of investment fundamentals. Subsequent, more difficult challenges will expand to test your performance when facing uncertainty.
Criteria #1: Simple Formulas
Real estate private equity investments professionals spend more time reading Excels than they do writing Excels. Thus, long, spaghetti formulas that follow winding paths are a needless headache. Write clear, short formulas that repeat consistent patterns. Your future self, and those that audit your model, will thank you.
None of this:
=IF(B2>97, "A+", IF(B2>93, "A", IF(B2>89, "A-", IF(B2>87, "B+", IF(B2>83, "B", IF(B2>79, "B-", IF(B2>77, "C+", IF(B2>73, "C", IF(B2>69, "C-", IF(B2>57, "D+", IF(B2>53, "D", IF(B2>49, "D-", "F"))))))))))))
We Offer Free Professional Review
We will professionally review cases submitted to the relevant thread in our Case Study Help forum before the deadline of April 21st at 11:59pm
Various Methodologies Are Valid
No two excel models are ever quite the same. Your approach may look and feel a bit different than another participant's approach. When building your case and referencing educational materials, focus less on the exact design and implementation of the solution. Where you may choose an INDEX-MATCH, another might prefer a SUMIFS. Rather, focus on the investment thesis and cash flow story that drives the model.
One Solution Is Correct
Although your implementation may vary, only one accurate solution exists for this particular real estate investment case study challenge. We provide you with all relevant inputs, removing assumption uncertainty. Because one solution exists, we are able to judge the correctness of your model. Bear in mind, this challenge tests your mechanical ability and general awareness of investment fundamentals. Subsequent, more difficult challenges will expand to test your performance when facing uncertainty.
Our Judgment Criteria
Criteria #1: Simple Formulas
Real estate private equity investments professionals spend more time reading Excels than they do writing Excels. Thus, long, spaghetti formulas that follow winding paths are a needless headache. Write clear, short formulas that repeat consistent patterns. Your future self, and those that audit your model, will thank you.
None of this:
=IF(B2>97, "A+", IF(B2>93, "A", IF(B2>89, "A-", IF(B2>87, "B+", IF(B2>83, "B", IF(B2>79, "B-", IF(B2>77, "C+", IF(B2>73, "C", IF(B2>69, "C-", IF(B2>57, "D+", IF(B2>53, "D", IF(B2>49, "D-", "F"))))))))))))
Excel Spaghetti Functions
Criteria #2 Style and Arrangement
Real Estate Private Equity Excel Models are created to convey information. If your model is hard for an outsider to access or quickly read, then your model is bad. Good style and arrangement directly impact your model's ability to convey information. Imagine your boss calls you at 2AM on Saturday demanding urgent information from a model your colleague built who is currently out of town. Compare the two examples below and imagine which you would prefer to be stuck with.
Bad Style Example
Reproduction of Top YouTube Result for "Real Estate Private Equity Model" |
Good Style Example
Monthly Cash Flows in the Verdant Apartments LBO Model from Breaking Down REPE |
Criteria #3: Trustworthiness (Checks and Testing)
You need to convince other investors to trust your model works correctly. Further, your readers do not need to review your model's functionality if your checks are designed well. Building trust and saving your readers time is a win-win. Every model needs robust checks. Any model without obvious, robust built-in checks is an immediate failure.
Criteria #4: Correctness
Beyond building a model that is easy to use, read, and trustworthy, you also need to accurately forecast the cash flows. Our specific prompt removes uncertainty and paints the same picture for all participants. If your math is correct, you will arrive at the same result as our team of professional real estate private equity investors.
Relevant Educational Materials
To learn the fundamental skills necessary to complete this case challenge, check out our Real Estate Private Equity Starter Kit. This course takes several hours.
If you need to prepare for a real estate private equity interview or want to dive deeper into the nuances of investing, then check out our flagship course, Breaking Down Real Estate Private Equity. This course takes several weeks.
If you need to prepare for a real estate private equity interview or want to dive deeper into the nuances of investing, then check out our flagship course, Breaking Down Real Estate Private Equity. This course takes several weeks.
The Case
Below is a high-level description of an apartment building that is for sale. Given a target gross levered return of 11.0%, what would you pay for this building? To answer this question, build a monthly cash flow model that meets the four judgment criteria listed above.
Unlevered Assumptions
Unlevered Assumptions
- 350 Total Units at $X per month
- $50 of other income per month
- 95% run-rate occupancy
- $1,250 of total opearting expenses per unit per month (every expense, inclusive of RE tax, insurance, utilities, etc.)
- $350 of capital reserves per unit per year
- Property management fee is 2.5% of effective gross revenue (EGR)
- 10 year investment hold period
- 3% income growth rate
- 2.5% expense growth rate
Levered Assumptions
- Property is offered free and clear
- Your fund's leverage constraint is 50% LTV
- Issue floating rate debt, assume the market rate is L+200bps
- Debt terms are 60 months I/O with an amortization term of 360 months
Useful External Resources
You can find the LIBOR curve on Chatham Financial's website
Learn more about modeling amortizing debt at Excel Easy
Comments
Post a Comment